[1. CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:09] TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER FOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AT THE TABLE. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. TODAY IS THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER THE 24TH, AND IT IS 5:32 P.M. WE HAVE PRESENT TODAY, LORI LINDSEY, CHAIR, ZACH BERLIN, SPENCER, SUSAN BARCELLA, STEPHANIE GARCIA AND DEBORAH KELLY. AND NOT IN ATTENDANCE ARE DANNY STEVENS AND KELLY WALKER. AND I HAVEN'T HEARD FROM EITHER ONE OF THOSE. SO WITH THAT, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND START. I'LL ASK YOU TO STAND FOR THE INVOCATION AND REMAIN STANDING FOR THE PLEDGE. LORD, I JUST THANK YOU FOR THIS TIME FOR US TO COME TOGETHER AS A CITY AND A. AND AS COMMISSIONERS HERE, LORD, JUST TO LOOK OVER THE WORK OF THE CITY AND WHAT IS LOOKING AT WHAT IS RIGHT. I JUST ASK THAT YOU BE WITH EACH ONE OF US AND KEEP ALL OF THOSE THINGS MINDFUL AS WE GO THROUGH THIS MEETING. IN YOUR NAME WE PRAY. AMEN. AMEN. THE PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE. TEXAS. ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE. THANK YOU. YOU CAN BE SEATED. AT THIS TIME. WE WILL HEAR FROM ANYONE, ANY OF OUR VISITORS WHO ARE WANT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST ANYTHING THAT IS NOT ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT. SO IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT YOU'VE COME AND YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING REGARDING, NOW IS THE TIME THAT YOU CAN DO THAT. IT LOOKS LIKE [5. ADOPTION OF MINUTES] WE DO NOT HAVE ANYBODY AT THIS TIME. SO WE WILL START WITH OUR MINUTES ADOPTING OUR MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING. COMMISSIONERS, HAVE YOU HAD A CHANCE TO READ THE MINUTES? AND DO YOU HAVE ANY CHANGES? AND IF NOT, IF I CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION. SECOND MINUTE. RIGHT. AND DO WE HAVE A SECOND? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ON OUR AUGUST, THE 27TH MINUTES FOR PLANNING AND ZONING. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. OKAY. MOVING [6. PUBLIC HEARING] ALONG TO OUR PUBLIC HEARING. I'M GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THIS TIME WE'RE LOOKING AT ITEM 6.1, WHICH IS CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TO TO ALLOW USE NUMBER THREE FOUR, THREE SALVAGE RECLAMATION AND RECYCLING MATERIALS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT ZERO GARDNER AND IDENTIFIED AS LOT 12PP NUMBER MN000-0220-00. BLOCK 101. MOORE AND NASH ADDITION, CITY OF TERRELL KAUFMAN COUNTY, TEXAS. THIS PROPERTY IS FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS KAUFMAN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, PROPERTY ID 31734 AND ITS CAUSE NUMBER SUP26-3200. AND THIS AGAIN IS AGENDA ITEM 6.1. GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS AN SUP REQUEST FOR A PROPERTY THAT IS ADJACENT TO AN ALREADY IN USE BUSINESS. SO THIS IS FOR AS YOU SAID, ZERO GARDNER STREET. THE CURRENT ZONING IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. IT'S A WHOLE CITY BLOCK. I'LL SHOW YOU THE LOCATION MAP HERE IN JUST A MOMENT. AND ALL OF THE PROPERTIES ADJACENT ARE ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AS WELL. SO THE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW FOR USE NUMBER 343 FROM THE USE CHARTS [00:05:03] IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. AND THAT USE IS SALVAGE RECLAMATION OR RECYCLING OF MATERIALS, WHICH AGAIN IS IN AGREEMENT WITH WHAT THE EXISTING BUSINESS IS ALREADY DOING. WE SENT A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE TO THE, EXCUSE ME, TO THE TERRELL TRIBUNE THAT WAS PUBLISHED ON SEPTEMBER 9TH AND HAS BEEN PUBLISHED EACH SUBSEQUENT SATURDAY SINCE THEN, WE MAILED FIVE LETTERS TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMING THEM, AND WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY BACK, EITHER IN FAVOR OR OPPOSED AT THIS TIME. SO THE OWNER FOR THIS AND THE APPLICANT IS FALCON METALS. THAT'S THE EXISTING BUSINESS. AND THE APPLICANT ISN'T HERE TO SPEAK WITH Y'ALL IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR HIM THIS EVENING. SO THE CURRENT PROPERTY IS ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. THE PROPOSED SUP WOULD ALLOW THE EXISTING BUSINESS TO EXPAND THEIR USE TO THIS LOT. IF APPROVED, OR THE NEXT STEPS WILL BE FOR CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THIS REQUEST WITH YOUR RECOMMENDATION AT THE OCTOBER 20TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOLLOWING YOUR RECOMMENDATION. SO HERE IS OUR LOCATION MAP. SO THIS IS THE LOT IN QUESTION HERE. THERE IS AN OLD FOUNDATION OF A PREVIOUS BUILDING HERE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER IS GOING TO MOVE AWAY. AND THESE THREE LOTS HERE ARE WHERE THE EXISTING BUILDING ALREADY IS. YOU SEE ON OUR ZONING MAP HERE WE HAVE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING ALL AROUND. ON THIS BLOCK. THERE IS SOME SINGLE FAMILY SIX ON THIS SIDE, BUT THERE ARE NO STRUCTURES BUILT IN THAT LOCATION AT THIS TIME. FUTURE LAND USE CALLS FOR THIS LOT TO BE PUBLIC USE OR A SCHOOL. AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE. AND THEN THIS IS THE BUFFER MAP SHOWING THE 200 FOOT RADIUS WHERE PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED. SO I WILL STOP THERE FOR QUESTIONS. OR IF YOU'D LIKE TO CALL THE APPLICANT UP TO ASK QUESTIONS OF HIM AS WELL. I'M OPENING THE PUBLIC MEETING NOW. ANYBODY? DOES ANYONE WANT TO WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? 6.1 YOU WANT TO YOU WANT TO COME AND SPEAK FOR IT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. THERE'S NO ONE TO SPEAK. THEN WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC. I KNOW, I'M SORRY. ALL RIGHT. SO NOW, COMMISSIONERS, YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE. I HAVE A QUESTION. YES, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT. WILL YOU COME FORWARD? YEAH. STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS. JULIO STEEL AND YOUR ADDRESS. 707 EAST GROVE STREET. THANK YOU. YOU SAID YOUR NAME WAS JULIA, JULIA STEELE. MR. STEEL. OKAY. HOW ARE YOU DOING? GOOD. HOW ARE YOU? I JUST, I'M GOING TO SAY, BEING NOSY. INQUISITIVE. SURE. WHAT? WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO PUT ON THE LOT THERE? SO WE JUST WANT TO GRADE IT OUT AND DEMO THE EXISTING CONCRETE PAD THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY AN ICE HOUSE AND FELL DOWN MANY YEARS AGO. IS THAT MISS MIKE OR. SO? WE'RE NOT LOOKING TO PUT ANYTHING THERE. WE'RE JUST LOOKING TO UTILIZE THAT LAND TO EXPAND OUR SCRAP OPERATION. REASON I WAS ASKING, I DON'T KNOW IF MAYBE YOU WERE ABOUT TO BRING IN A RECYCLING OPERATION. WE'RE ALREADY DOING RECYCLING THERE. WE'VE BEEN THERE SINCE 2006. WE ACTUALLY SUPPORT METAL MANUFACTURERS, METAL VFW. WE SUPPORT A FEW OF THE LOCAL MANUFACTURERS HERE IN TAROT, RIGHT? LIKE NUCOR OR R&R DESIGN AND A FEW OTHERS. SO THAT'S REALLY WHAT WE DO IS WE METAL SCRAP. YEAH, I DIDN'T KNOW. I WAS JUST ASKING IN HOPES OF MAYBE YOU WERE GOING TO DO SOME PLASTIC. I MEAN, YOU KNOW, SOME. NO, THERE'S A BIG NEED FOR THAT. IT IS. WE DON'T TAKE IT FROM THE PUBLIC, BUT WE DO WITH SOME OF OUR CUSTOMERS THAT DO PRODUCE CARDBOARD OR PLASTICS THAT ARE RECYCLABLE. WE DO HANDLE THAT RIGHT NOW FROM THE PUBLIC. WE'RE JUST RECYCLING METAL. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S [00:10:05] ALL I WAS WANTING TO KNOW. JUST BEING JUST ONE. ANYBODY ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS ON THE COMMISSION FOR MR. STEEL? OKAY. DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR. I HAVE A QUESTION. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. WHAT TYPE OF CONSTRAINTS HAVE YOU PUT ON THIS? SUPI MEAN, YOU YOU KNOW WHAT HE ALREADY HAS EXISTING THERE. AND YOU KNOW WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. SO WHAT HAVE YOU WHAT HAVE YOU DONE DIFFERENTLY FOR IF THIS EXPANSION IS GRANTED A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND STAFF DOESN'T NECESSARILY ALLOW US TO PUT EXTRA NEW RESTRICTIONS ON SOMEBODY, IT'S JUST TO ALLOW THAT SPECIFIC USE. AND SO THERE ARE THERE IS NOTHING ADDITIONAL WRITTEN INTO THIS S P. IT WOULD JUST ALLOW THEM TO ONLY USE IT FOR THAT. USE THE SALVAGE RECLAMATION OF MATERIALS USE. OKAY. WHAT ABOUT. EXTERIOR WALLS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. DID YOU GUYS TALK ABOUT THAT WITH THEM. THEY WOULD BE SUBJECT TO ALL ZONING RESTRICTIONS FOR THAT. THERE IS SOME DISCUSSION WITH MR. STEEL AND THE FACILITY TO WORK ON UPGRADING, FENCING AND SCREENING SO THAT THAT LOOKS A LITTLE NICER FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND A LITTLE LESS THERE. I THINK THERE'S SOME OUR PANEL FENCING RIGHT NOW, SO THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE THAT DOWN AND MAKE THAT LESS OF A HAZARD. I JUST WANTED TO CONFIRM THAT THIS SUP IS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS SPS RUN WITH PROPERTY. SO, SO LONG AS SOMEONE IS USING THAT, WE'LL GO BACK AND REVIEW. CORRECT. OKAY. THAT'S ALL I NEEDED TO KNOW. OKAY. AND. I. OKAY. ANY MORE QUESTIONS? YOU CAN YOU CAN HAVE A SEAT. MR. AND OH, YOU CAN. YEAH. OKAY. WELL, I'M SORRY, I'M JUST CLARIFY THAT YOU WERE ALSO WITH MR. AND AND THIS IS KIND OF SEPARATE FROM THE SUBSTANCES THAT WE TO THOSE PRIVATE OPERATORS. AND I THINK IT'S BETTER BECAUSE THEY CAN'T AFFORD THAT $5 FOR THAT TIME. HOW MANY SUBSEQUENT STUDIES HAVE HAVE ALSO BEEN INVESTIGATED IN THIS. AND 75%. OF. THOSE. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IF WE DON'T, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THIS ITEM. MADAM CHAIR, I MOVE TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE SPECIAL USE REQUEST TO EXPAND THE RECYCLING OPERATION ONTO THE ADJACENT PARCEL LOCATED ON ZERO GARDNER STREET. BASED ON ITS DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE CITY OF TERRELL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WHILE THE CURRENT OPERATION MAY EXIST ON THE ORIGINAL TRACK, EXTENDING ITS HIGH IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL FOOTPRINT ONTO AN ADJACENT LOT REPRESENT AN UNACCEPTABLE ENCROACHMENT TOWARD ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL AREAS, AND IT'S ALSO. THIS EXPANSION WILL INCREASE INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC AND OTHER ISSUES, DIRECTLY VIOLATING OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP GUIDELINES FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION. THE PROPOSED EXPANSION IS FUNDAMENTALLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY, CHARACTER, AND LONG TERM VISION. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION TO DENY THE SUP MR. KELLY, DO WE HAVE A SECOND TO THAT MOTION? I SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION TO DENY AND A SECOND, I'LL HAVE TO HAVE TO THINK ABOUT HOW YOU SAY THAT. ALL IN FAVOR OF DENYING THE SUP WILL STATE WILL SAY SO BY STATING I. I I. IF WE CAN GO A [00:15:12] ROLL CALL HERE, WE'LL START MISS SPENCER. FOR DENYING. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. I'M GOING TO SAY NAY. OKAY. I'M GOING TO SAY NO, MISS KELLY. NAY. YOU'RE IN FAVOR OF DENIAL. OH I OH I'M SORRY. YEAH. I'M IN FAVOR OF DENIAL. ALRIGHT. THE VOTE IS 3 TO 2. DENIAL IS DENIED. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO SIX POINT. OH. DENIAL DENIED. WHICH MEANS THAT IT PASSED. OKAY. YEAH. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT. IT MOVES FORWARD FOR PLANNING AND ZONING FROM PLANNING AND ZONING. OKAY. PUBLIC HEARING 6.2 IS CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURE TO HIGHWAY CORRIDOR TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ON 8.5304 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE THOMAS F SMITH SURVEY. ABSTRACT NUMBER 493. CITY OF TERRELL KAUFMAN COUNTY, TEXAS. THE PROPERTY IS IDENTIFIED AS KAUFMAN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, PROPERTY ID 2994 3299 4629 9472 99482995729958, AND 29959. TERRELL KAUFMAN COUNTY, TEXAS. AND THIS IS ZONING CHANGE 26-3201. STAFF. ALL RIGHT COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A ZONE CHANGE FOR YOU THIS EVENING. THIS IS FOR PROPERTY THAT IS CURRENTLY ZONED. SOME OF IT IS AGRICULTURE AND SOME IS HIGHWAY CORRIDOR. SO THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR THESE PARCELS TO BE REZONED TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE. WE SENT A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE TO THE TERRELL TRIBUNE AND IT WAS PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 5TH AND EACH SUBSEQUENT SATURDAY. SINCE THEN, WE MAILED 15 LETTERS TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS, AND WE HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING EITHER IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION. THE APPLICANT IS D I AIRFIELD INTERCHANGE TWO LP, AND THIS. THESE PARCELS ARE PART OF THE NORTH SPUR DEVELOPMENT AREA, SO THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE CURRENTLY ZONED AG AND HIGHWAY CORRIDOR. PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE SUPPORTS A BLEND OF ROAD. OOPS THAT'S NOT CORRECT. SO STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE APPLICANT EXTEND THE BOUNDARY OF THE CURRENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH SPUR TO ENCOMPASS THESE LOTS. INSTEAD OF DOING A SPECIFIC ZONE CHANGE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. SO OUR POSITION IS THAT INCORPORATING THIS INTO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WOULD COMPLY WITH THE RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE LAID OUT IN THE PD, BUT IT WOULD ALSO CAUSE THE WHATEVER BUILDINGS ARE BEING PUT THERE TO BE SUBJECT TO THE MORE A LITTLE BIT MORE STRICT ZONING THAT'S LAID OUT IN THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR THAT. SO IF THIS PASSES, IT WILL GO FORWARD TO THE OCTOBER 20TH MEETING AND THEN AGAIN FOR THE NOVEMBER CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS WELL. SO HERE WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF A LOCATION MAP FOR YOU. AND THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR NORTH SPUR COMES KIND OF AROUND THIS DIRECTION AND JUST BUTTS RIGHT UP TO THIS. SO THESE ARE THE PARCELS THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING THIS EVENING. AND YOU CAN SEE HERE THERE'S THAT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMES RIGHT UP TO THOSE PARCELS. WE HAVE AG AND SOME HIGHWAY CORRIDOR. AND THEN SOME OF THIS HAS BEEN RECENTLY ANNEXED. SO IT DOES NOT YET HAVE ZONING. OUR FUTURE LAND USE CALLS FOR LOCAL COMMERCIAL HERE. AND THEN THIS WAS ALL NOT PART OF OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT THE TIME OF. THE COMPREHENSIVE MAP, THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BEING CREATED. SO THERE IS NO SPECIFIC ZONING ALLOCATED FOR THAT. AND THIS IS THE BUFFER MAP SHOWING THE [00:20:07] SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WERE NOTIFIED. AND I WILL STOP HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. OH AND THE APPLICANTS ARE HERE IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THEM. OKAY. SO THAT'S GOING TO BE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PUT UP. OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO OPEN UP 6.2 FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS AT THIS TIME. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, I'D ASK THAT YOU COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS FOR US. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND THE GREAT JOB. WITH THE APPLICANT. SOMETHING TO. THAT. CONVERSATION, WITH THE CITY. YES. MORE THAN ANY OTHER ISSUES THAT. YEAH. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. DOES ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO SPEAK FOR. 6.2? YOU WISH TO SPEAK FOR IT? OKAY. IF YOU'LL COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS. AT THIS TIME. OKAY. IF YOU HAVE ANY. NEW BUSINESS. AND YOU. HAVE. NOT. MADE THE REQUEST. FOR. YOU CAN SEE THAT. YOU CAN SEE HOW IT'S SPLIT IN FRONT OF OUR PROPERTY. OKAY. SHOW THAT AGAIN. KATIE. DID YOU SEE THAT SMALL SLIVER? YEAH. THAT'S BASICALLY IT'S OKAY. IT'S NOT GOING TO INCLUDE. OKAY LEADING UP TO IT. OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO SWAP OVER. YEAH. AT THIS POINT IT'S NOT HER PROPERTY. OKAY, GOOD. OKAY. YEAH. THAT'S CLEAR. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT. OKAY. DOES ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST ITEM 6.2 ON THE AGENDA? IF NOT, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. [00:25:10] COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I DO QUESTION WHAT'S THERE. OKAY. SO MY UNDERSTANDING MAKE SURE I'M UNDERSTANDING THIS CORRECTLY IS THEY ARE ASKING THEY WERE ASKING FOR A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. CORRECT YOUR REQUEST THAT THEY KEEP IT THE EXISTING ZONING JUST EXPAND OUT. SO WHAT WHAT IS YOUR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? EXPLAIN THAT DOWN THERE. I'M TRYING TO STAFF IS PROPOSING IS THAT THE BOUNDARY THAT'S HERE IN THE BLUE. THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT WOULD JUST MOVE. AND ALL THIS SECTION THAT'S HIGHLIGHTED IN RED HERE ON THE MAP THAT WOULD JUST BE BLUE. AND PART OF THE PD IS WHAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING. OKAY. AND SO IF YOU. AND THEN IT WOULD CONTINUE TO BE WHATEVER THEIR CURRENT ZONING IS, WHICH IS LET ME GIVE YOU A LITTLE HISTORY LESSON. THAT'S REALLY. THAT WAS A PD THAT WAS DEVELOPED IN 2004. AND BEFORE IT WAS PROPERTY. WELL, PART OF THE OLD DEVELOPMENT AREA. SO THIS SIDE OF THE STREET IS CONSIDERED TO BE INDUSTRIAL SIDE. AS YOU ALL KNOW, THE EAST SIDE OF CURRENTLY HOUSES UP THERE RIGHT NOW. SO IN THAT INDUSTRIAL SIDE, THEY OWNED A PD. AND SO ALL WE'RE DOING IS EXTENDING THAT HE TOOK. IT COMES. SO IT ALL HAS TO DO WITH OKAY. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS, ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. WELL, MY CONCERN I GUESS LET ME JUST SAY THIS. AND THEN MY CONCERN IS IF THAT'S WHAT YOU GUYS ARE RECOMMENDING AND THEY'RE AMENABLE TO THAT AND THAT THEY'RE OKAY WITH THAT, THEN SHOULDN'T WE GO BACK AND READ IT, REDO THIS WHOLE THING TO, TO JUST SAY THAT RATHER THAN BECAUSE IT'S KIND OF CONFUSING TO SAY THEY WANT THIS, BUT WE'RE RECOMMENDING THIS. SO, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS OF THIS IS WHAT WAS ASKED FOR. OKAY, DURING STAFF'S REVIEW PROCESS, WE FEEL THAT THE THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT EXTENSION WOULD BE BETTER IN ALIGNMENT WITH OUR OVERALL GOAL FOR THAT AREA. AND IT WOULD IT WOULD JUST OFFER A LITTLE MORE PROTECTION FOR SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. RIGHT. BUT WHAT I'M SAYING SO THEN WHEN WE ARE APPROVING IT, ARE WE APPROVING WHAT THEY ASKED FOR WITH YOUR RECOMMENDATION? OR WHAT ARE WE APPROVING IS THAT WE'RE APPROVING? SO YOU WOULD APPROVE? OKAY, SO THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING HIM. COULD WE NOT HAVE GOTTEN THIS WORD? THAT'S WHAT IT SAYS, AND THEN WE APPROVE IT. YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? MAYBE Y'ALL GET TOGETHER ON IT AND CHANGE IT. OKAY? WE HAVE TO WE HAVE TO PRESENT IT. OKAY. WE HAVE. OKAY. GOTCHA. WE HAVE TO PRESENT IT TO YOU THE WAY THAT IT WAS PRESENTED, I UNDERSTAND. RIGHT? OKAY. YEAH. BUT WE IF IF THE COMMISSIONERS WANTED TO, COULD JUST MAKE THE RECOMMENDATION THAT YOU DO IT WITH IT ENCOMPASSING THE PD. SO I GUESS WHAT I MAKE THE MOTION. THAT'S IT. OKAY. DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY. IF THERE ARE NO MORE QUESTIONS THEN I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. OKAY. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THIS WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS OF JUST EXTENDING THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO KEEP IT IN LINE WITH WHAT THE CURRENT ZONING OR RESTRICTIVE ZONING DETAILS ARE FOR THE PD. OKAY. I SECOND THE MOTION. SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR 6.2 ZONE CHANGE 263201 TO HAVE THE PD EXTEND INTO THIS AREA TO KEEP IT IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE WITH THAT, WITH RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE ALREADY SET IN PLACE. WITH THAT, ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HERE YOU GO. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON. OUR NEXT THING IS CONSENT AGENDA. AND THAT IS [7. CONSENT AGENDA] SEVEN. AND WE HAVE. WE HAVE 7.1 AND 7.2. THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU. WE HAVE 7.1 AND 7.2 ON [00:30:13] HERE. AND WE TAKE THESE AS A PACKAGE. OR IF YOU WANT TO SEPARATE ANY OF THEM OUT, YOU MAY DO SO. YOU MAY ASK US TO DO SO HERE AS COMMISSIONERS AND WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY OF THOSE THAT THEY WANT TO DISCUSS, OR DO WE WANT TO KEEP THEM AS A PACKAGE? OKAY. DOESN'T APPEAR THAT ANYBODY WANTS TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ON ONE PARTICULAR ITEM. SO WE WILL TAKE THEM ALL IN ONE. AND SO WE HAVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS TWO. OKAY. WE HAVE THE TWO WHICH IS 7.1 AND 7.2. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION AT THIS TIME FOR THOSE TWO ITEMS. MADAM CHAIR, I MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT I MAY APPROVE ITEM 7.17.2 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND AND WE HAVE A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.